U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on WOTUS
Stakeholders looking to Supreme Court for much-needed clarity on the definition of waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act.
On October 3, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case (Sackett v. EPA) that addresses the uncertain and inconsistent definition of waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The debate centers on whether CWA jurisdiction extends to: (1) a narrow definition of wetlands – specifically, whether waters that are “relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing” and to the wetlands that are immediately adjacent to such waters, or (2) a broader definition of wetlands – where there is a so-called “ ‘significant nexus’ between the wetlands in question and navigable waters in a traditional sense.”
Expectations for the Supreme Court’s Approach
Most observers expect the Supreme Court to take a middle-ground approach to the expansive “significant nexus” test and the more restrictive “permanent, standing, and continuously flowing” test, and provide much needed direction for future rulemakings to define WOTUS. The Biden Administration has already indicated that it intends to wait for the Supreme Court decisions before proceeding on its new rulemaking to define WOTUS.
The Supreme Court could also apply the “major questions doctrine” that would require specific legislative authorization and direction from Congress before EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) can finalize a revised definition of WOTUS on such a high-profile rulemaking. This could further delay or complicate a new decision from EPA and the Corps until Congress provides the requisite legislative authority.
The Supreme Court decision will provide some much-needed clarity on this issue. In the meantime, the long-term future of WOTUS will remain uncertain. If you have any questions or would like additional information about the Supreme Court case and the WOTUS rulemaking, please contact Jeff Hannapel or Christian Richter with NASF at jhannapel@thepolicygroup.com or crichter@thepolicygroup.com.
This update is courtesy of the National Association for Surface Finishing (NASF). For more information or to become a member, visit nasf.org.
Related Content
-
Development of a Novel Hexavalent-Chromium-Free Aluminum Sacrificial Paint
Hexavalent chromium is a known carcinogen, repro-toxin, and mutagen. Its elimination is of high importance to the aerospace industry, which has struggled to find high performing alternatives. Legacy aluminum sacrificial paints have traditionally utilized hexavalent chromium to prevent corrosion and coatings which are equal to or better than have been difficult. This first paper discusses the novel process from the supplier point-of-view.
-
NASF/AESF Foundation Research Project #123: Electrochemical Manufacturing for Energy Applications – 4th and 5th Quarter Report
The NASF-AESF Foundation Research Board selected a project on electrodeposition toward developing low-cost and scalable manufacturing processes for hydrogen fuel cells and electrolysis cells for clean transportation and distributed power applications. During the reporting period, efforts were focused on planning the overall project work, with the eventual goal of manufacturing an improved design for a Solid oxide fuel cell anode supported flat tube (SOFC).
-
Smart Modeling and Simulation of Electroplating Systems for Real-Time Monitoring of Chemical, Water and Energy Consumption (NASF Summer Research Grant)
An AESF Foundation summer research grant provided an excellent opportunity for a PhD student to learn how to use chemical engineering fundamentals to scientifically characterize an electroplating process through integrated dynamic modeling and simulation, and how to develop digital twin (DT)-based virtual plant that can be of any process configuration. This is a critical step for the investigation of new technology development for smart and sustainable manufacturing in the surface finishing industry.
